Forkey v. Perrine Center Pharmacy

198 So. 2d 325, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3877
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 12, 1967
DocketNo. 35968
StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 2d 325 (Forkey v. Perrine Center Pharmacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forkey v. Perrine Center Pharmacy, 198 So. 2d 325, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3877 (Fla. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 'October 24, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorneys’ fees of petitioner is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 So. 2d 325, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forkey-v-perrine-center-pharmacy-fla-1967.