Fork Junction Coal Co. v. Clark

232 F.2d 895
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 1956
DocketNos. 12672, 12673
StatusPublished

This text of 232 F.2d 895 (Fork Junction Coal Co. v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fork Junction Coal Co. v. Clark, 232 F.2d 895 (6th Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard on the oral arguments and briefs of counsel and on the record in the case;

[896]*896And it appearing from the opinion of United States District Judge Swinford, which embraces his findings of fact and conclusions of law, that there is substantial evidence to support his findings and that the same are not clearly erroneous; and that his conclusions of law are supported by adequate authority. See Hall v. Eversole, 251 Ky. 296, 64 S.W.2d 891; Tierney Land Co. v. Kingston Pocahontas Coal Company, 241 Ky. 101, 43 S.W.2d 517.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hall v. Eversole's Adm'r
64 S.W.2d 891 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1933)
Laurence E. Tierney Land Co. v. Kingston-Pocahontas Coal Co.
43 S.W.2d 517 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 F.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fork-junction-coal-co-v-clark-ca6-1956.