Fork Junction Coal Co. v. Clark

Sixth Circuit

Fork Junction Coal Co. v. Clark

232 F.2d 895

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 20, 1956·No. Nos. 12672, 12673·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard on the oral arguments and briefs of counsel and on the record in the case;

[896] And it appearing from the opinion of United States District Judge Swinford, which embraces his findings of fact and conclusions of law, that there is substantial evidence to support his findings and that the same are not clearly erroneous; and that his conclusions of law are supported by adequate authority. See Hall v. Eversole, 251 Ky. 296, 64 S.W.2d 891; Tierney Land Co. v. Kingston Pocahontas Coal Company, 241 Ky. 101, 43 S.W.2d 517.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause has been heard on the oral arguments and briefs of counsel and on the record in the case;

[896] And it appearing from the opinion of United States District Judge Swinford, which embraces his findings of fact and conclusions of law, that there is substantial evidence to support his findings and that the same are not clearly erroneous; and that his conclusions of law are supported by adequate authority. See Hall v. Eversole, 251 Ky. 296, 64 S.W.2d 891; Tierney Land Co. v. Kingston Pocahontas Coal Company, 241 Ky. 101, 43 S.W.2d 517.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Fork Junction Coal Co. v. Clark, 232 F.2d 895 (6th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

232 F.2d 895 (Fork Junction Coal Co. v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related