Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc.

132 F.3d 645, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 106, 1998 WL 3200
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 F.3d 758
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 7, 1998·No. 95-5516·Published

Opinion

*646 PER CURIAM:

We previously certified to the Florida Supreme Court the following dispositive question in this case:

Can a claim for negligence by an insured against an insurance agent for failure to obtain proper insurance coverage be assigned to a third party?

Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc., 93 F.3d 758, 761 (11th Cir.1996). The Supreme Court of Florida has now definitively answered that state law question in the affirmative, disagreeing with the district court. See David Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc., 701 So.2d 557 (Fla.1997). We are indebted to the Florida Supreme Court for its authoritative resolution of the controlling state law issue.

The judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc., 132 F.3d 645, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 106, 1998 WL 3200 (11th Cir. 1998).

132 F.3d 645 (Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc.
93 F.3d 758 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc.
701 So. 2d 557 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)