Forgey v. Sutliff
5 Cow. 713
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided December 15, 1825·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Sanford, Chancellor, and Golden, Senator, delivered opinions here, in which they concurred with the court below, that the demandant took her dower as purchaser within the meaning and construction of the act of 1802, (2 R. L. 542.) And the judgment of the Supreme Court was affirmed by the whole court; except Lynde and Redfield, Senators, who were for reversal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Forgey v. Sutliff, 5 Cow. 713 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).
5 Cow. 713 (Forgey v. Sutliff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jourdan v. Haran
3 N.Y.S. 541 (Superior Court of New York, 1888)
Burton v. Burton
1 Abb. Ct. App. 271 (New York Court of Appeals, 1864)