Home/Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors/Forgey v. Sutliff

Forgey v. Sutliff

5 Cow. 713
CourtCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
DecidedDecember 15, 1825
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 Cow. 713 (Forgey v. Sutliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forgey v. Sutliff, 5 Cow. 713 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).

Opinion

Sanford, Chancellor, and Golden, Senator, delivered opinions here, in which they concurred with the court below, that the demandant took her dower as purchaser within the meaning and construction of the act of 1802, (2 R. L. 542.) And the judgment of the Supreme Court was affirmed by the whole court; except Lynde and Redfield, Senators, who were for reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jourdan v. Haran
3 N.Y.S. 541 (Superior Court of New York, 1888)
Burton v. Burton
1 Abb. Ct. App. 271 (New York Court of Appeals, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cow. 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forgey-v-sutliff-nycterr-1825.