Foret v. Manuel

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Foret v. Manuel

142 So. 2d 593, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 2078

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 13, 1962·No. No. 600·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

TATE, Judge.

After so notifying this court, the defendants-appellants did not appear in person or through counsel when their case was called for argument on the date it had been docketed for hearing, and no brief was filed on their behalf. This appeal is therefore considered abandoned, and accordingly is hereby dismissed. Rule VII, Section 4(b), Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, 8 LSA-R.S. (1960 pocket part); Fuselier v. South Louisiana Contractors, La.App. 3 Cir., 138 So.2d 453, and authorities cited therein. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants-appellants.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TATE, Judge.

After so notifying this court, the defendants-appellants did not appear in person or through counsel when their case was called for argument on the date it had been docketed for hearing, and no brief was filed on their behalf. This appeal is therefore considered abandoned, and accordingly is hereby dismissed. Rule VII, Section 4(b), Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, 8 LSA-R.S. (1960 pocket part); Fuselier v. South Louisiana Contractors, La.App. 3 Cir., 138 So.2d 453, and authorities cited therein. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants-appellants.

Appeal dismissed.

Foret v. Manuel, 142 So. 2d 593, 1962 La. App. LEXIS 2078 (La. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

142 So. 2d 593 (Foret v. Manuel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related