Forestal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Forestal v. State

724 So. 2d 697, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 483, 1999 WL 22334

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 1999·No. No. 98-1033·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hans Forestal appeals his judgments and sentences which were imposed by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of committing the crimes of attempted first degree murder with a firearm, robbery with a firearm, and petit theft.¹ We affirm because Mr. Forestáis claim that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal lacks merit. The record contains sufficient evidence of his identity as the perpetrator of the crimes, including identification testimony from the victim. See Rider v. State, 724 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Judgments and Sentences AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Hans Forestal appeals his judgments and sentences which were imposed by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of committing the crimes of attempted first degree murder with a firearm, robbery with a firearm, and petit theft.¹ We affirm because Mr. Forestáis claim that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal lacks merit. The record contains sufficient evidence of his identity as the perpetrator of the crimes, including identification testimony from the victim. See Rider v. State, 724 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Judgments and Sentences AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Forestal v. State, 724 So. 2d 697, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 483, 1999 WL 22334 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

724 So. 2d 697 (Forestal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related