Forestal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Forestal v. State

724 So. 2d 697, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 483, 1999 WL 22334

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 22, 1999

DocketNo. 98-1033

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 724 So. 2d 697 (Forestal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forestal v. State, 724 So. 2d 697, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 483, 1999 WL 22334 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hans Forestal appeals his judgments and sentences which were imposed by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of committing the crimes of attempted first degree murder with a firearm, robbery with a firearm, and petit theft.¹ We affirm because Mr. Forestáis claim that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal lacks merit. The record contains sufficient evidence of his identity as the perpetrator of the crimes, including identification testimony from the victim. See Rider v. State, 724 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Judgments and Sentences AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Hans Forestal appeals his judgments and sentences which were imposed by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of committing the crimes of attempted first degree murder with a firearm, robbery with a firearm, and petit theft.¹ We affirm because Mr. Forestáis claim that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal lacks merit. The record contains sufficient evidence of his identity as the perpetrator of the crimes, including identification testimony from the victim. See Rider v. State, 724 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

Judgments and Sentences AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

724 So. 2d 697, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 483, 1999 WL 22334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forestal-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack