Forest Hills Masonic Guild, Inc. v. Boulevard Bank

273 A.D. 970, 78 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5524
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 12, 1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to obtain a judgment declaring that defendants were not entitled to exercise an option of purchase contained in a lease between plaintiff and defendant Boulevard Bank, and to restrain defendants from exercising the option, judgment was entered dismissing the complaint and granting specific performance to defendant Boulevard Bank, as prayed for in its counterclaim. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Mutual Life Ins. Go, v. Stephens, 214 N. Y. 488.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forest Hills Masonic Guild, Inc. v. Boulevard Bank, 273 A.D. 970, 78 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 970 (Forest Hills Masonic Guild, Inc. v. Boulevard Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Braten v. Baker
323 P.2d 929 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1958)