Forest Hills Masonic Guild, Inc. v. Boulevard Bank
This text of 273 A.D. 970 (Forest Hills Masonic Guild, Inc. v. Boulevard Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to obtain a judgment declaring that defendants were not entitled to exercise an option of purchase contained in a lease between plaintiff and defendant Boulevard Bank, and to restrain defendants from exercising the option, judgment was entered dismissing the complaint and granting specific performance to defendant Boulevard Bank, as prayed for in its counterclaim. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Mutual Life Ins. Go, v. Stephens, 214 N. Y. 488.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 A.D. 970, 78 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forest-hills-masonic-guild-inc-v-boulevard-bank-nyappdiv-1948.