Forest Hills Associates v. Ralin

677 N.E.2d 285, 89 N.Y.2d 936, 654 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 50
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 14, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 677 N.E.2d 285 (Forest Hills Associates v. Ralin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forest Hills Associates v. Ralin, 677 N.E.2d 285, 89 N.Y.2d 936, 654 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 50 (N.Y. 1997).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain the motion (see, NY Const, art VI, § 3; CPLR 5602).

Judge Titone taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5602
New York CVP § 5602

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
677 N.E.2d 285, 89 N.Y.2d 936, 654 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forest-hills-associates-v-ralin-ny-1997.