Forest Box & Lumber Co. v. Fraser Brace Overseas Corp.

17 Misc. 2d 619, 184 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4271
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 19, 1959·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Questions of interpretation of contract terms and specifications are not disputes as to questions of fact, and a determination by the United States Army contracting officer under a contract making his decisions on questions of fact binding on the parties is not binding on the plaintiff here, where such determination involved interpretation of written specifications. (U. S. Code, tit. 41, § 322; Pfotzer v. United States, 77 F. Supp. 390; Johnson Contr. Corp. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 698.) Dismissal of plaintiff’s first cause of action on the ground that the contracting officer’s decision was binding was therefore improper.

The order insofar as it dismisses the first cause of action should be reversed and the motion and cross motion seeking summary judgment with respect thereto denied, with $10 costs to plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forest Box & Lumber Co. v. Fraser Brace Overseas Corp., 17 Misc. 2d 619, 184 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4271 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

17 Misc. 2d 619 (Forest Box & Lumber Co. v. Fraser Brace Overseas Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pfotzer v. United States
77 F. Supp. 390 (Court of Claims, 1948)