Foresman v. Arrington

1954 OK 114, 270 P.2d 662, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 527
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 13, 1954
DocketNo. 36375
StatusPublished

This text of 1954 OK 114 (Foresman v. Arrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foresman v. Arrington, 1954 OK 114, 270 P.2d 662, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 527 (Okla. 1954).

Opinion

O’NEAL, Justice.

Judgment was entered for the defendants on November 3, 1952, and a motion for new trial was overruled September 11, 1953. On November 25,., 1953, the trial court allowed 60 days in addition to the time allowed by law for filing the appeal. The time allowed by law expired December 11, 1953; the 60 days expired February 9, 1954. The case-made was filed in this court February 26, 1954.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason the appeal was not lodged in this court within time. The motion must be sustained. '12 O.S.1951 § 972 provides that all proceedings to review judgments and final orders must be filed within three months or within an extended time not- exceeding six months. East Side Baptist Church v. Morgan, 204 Okl. 685, 233 P.2d 957; Adams v. Hobbs, 204 Okl. 85, 226 P.2d 913; Sheets v. Sheets, 204 Okl. 88, 226 P.2d 915; Dahlenburg v. Young, 206 Okl. 422, 243 P.2d 983.

Since the appeal was not filed within the time granted by the extension it is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

East Side Baptist Church v. Morgan
1951 OK 197 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1951)
Sheets v. Sheets
1950 OK 331 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1950)
Adams v. Hobbs
1950 OK 322 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1950)
Dahlenburg v. Young
1952 OK 162 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1954 OK 114, 270 P.2d 662, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foresman-v-arrington-okla-1954.