Foremost in Packaging Systems (Doing Business as Envirocooler) v. Cold Chain Technologies

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 8, 2007·No. 2007-1116·Unpublished

Opinion

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1116

FOREMOST IN PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC. (doing business as EnviroCooler),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COLD CHAIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

James C. Brooks, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Hope E. Melville and Mark J. Shean, of Irvine, California.

Edward R. Schwartz, Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP, of Pasadena, CA, argued for defendant-appellee.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Central District of California

Judge James V. Selna NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1116

FOREMOST IN PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC.

(doing business as EnviroCooler),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COLD CHAIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In CASE NO(S). 06-CV-01156.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (RADER, SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: August 8, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foremost in Packaging Systems (Doing Business as Envirocooler) v. Cold Chain Technologies, (Fed. Cir. 2007).

Foremost in Packaging Systems (Doing Business as Envirocooler) v. Cold Chain Technologies (Foremost in Packaging Systems (Doing Business as Envirocooler) v. Cold Chain Technologies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.