Foreman v. Weinstein
258 F. App'x 584
Opinion
Trumilla Foreman appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Foreman v. Weinstein, 485 F.Supp.2d 608 (D.Md.2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foreman v. Weinstein, 258 F. App'x 584 (4th Cir. 2007).
258 F. App'x 584 (Foreman v. Weinstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Foreman v. Weinstein
485 F. Supp. 2d 608 (D. Maryland, 2007)