Foreman v. State

20 S.W. 1109, 31 Tex. Crim. 477, 1893 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 143

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
• Decided: January 25, 1893
• Docket: No. 1.
• Status: Published

Opinion

SIMKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of having, in the presence and hearing of D. C. Crain, cursed, abused, and used violently abusive language to said Crain, concerning him, under circumstances reasonably calculated to provoke a breach of the peace, and was fined in the sum of $5, from which he appeals.

We see no error in the information. It correctly charges the offense. It was not necessary to set out the abusive language. Under article 314, Penal Code, it is only necessary to allege that the language was loud and vociferous, obscene, vulgar, or indecent, or that defendant did swear or curse, etc., in a manner calculated to disturb the inhabitants of such public place or private house; and so under article 495a, Penal Code, it is sufficient to allege that defendant, in the presence and hearing of another, did curse or abuse such person, etc., under circumstances reasonably calculated to provoke a breach of the peace. The intimation to the contrary in the Elkins case, 26 Texas Court of Appeals, 220, is obiter.

The evidence showed clearly that defendant was guilty as charged; that he cursed, abused, and used violently abusive language to and concerning D. C. Crain, and it was done in the presence of his (Crain’s) wife; and that he challenged Crain to meet him half-way for a fight, the parties being 50 yards apart.

The court did not err in refusing to give the special charge asked, for the reason, as stated by the court, the substance was given in the general charge. There are no other errors, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Judges all present and concurring.