Foreman v. Newkirk

Supreme Court of Virginia

Foreman v. Newkirk

3 Va. 275

DecidedJanuary 11, 1813

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Va. 275 (Foreman v. Newkirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foreman v. Newkirk, 3 Va. 275 (Va. 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

the following opinion of this Court was delivered by

Judge Roane.

“ The Court, concurring with the Chancellor in opinion, that it appears from the exhibits in the cause, that, independently of the sum enjoined in this case, there is a [277]*277sufficiency of money in the hands of the appellant to indemnify him, agreeably to the tenor of his contract, against any loss he may sustain in the land, in the proceedings mentioned, is of opinion, that there is no error in the said decree ; therefore, it is decreed and ordered shat the same be affirmed.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

the following opinion of this Court was delivered by

Judge Roane.

“ The Court, concurring with the Chancellor in opinion, that it appears from the exhibits in the cause, that, independently of the sum enjoined in this case, there is a [277]*277sufficiency of money in the hands of the appellant to indemnify him, agreeably to the tenor of his contract, against any loss he may sustain in the land, in the proceedings mentioned, is of opinion, that there is no error in the said decree ; therefore, it is decreed and ordered shat the same be affirmed.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Va. 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foreman-v-newkirk-va-1813.