Foreman v. Louis Jacques Construction Co.

246 A.D. 554

This text of 246 A.D. 554 (Foreman v. Louis Jacques Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foreman v. Louis Jacques Construction Co., 246 A.D. 554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Action to foreclose mechanics’ liens. Four years after a judgment had been made and entered, and after it had been affirmed by the Appellate Division [235 App. Div. 494] and modified, and as modified affirmed by the Court of Appeals [261 N. Y. 429], an order was made by the trial court adding a provision at the foot of the judgment, from which order this appeal was taken. Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and respondent’s motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the provision added to the judgment affects the substantial rights of the parties, and the trial court was without power to insert it. We have not considered nor do we pass upon the question of res judicata incidentally raised in the record and on the argument. We leave that question to be determined on the trial in the action now pending between the Progressive Clay Company and the Globe Indemnity Company. Lazansky, P, J., Scudder, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foreman v. Louis Jacques Construction Co.
185 N.E. 690 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
Foreman v. Louis Jacques Construction Co.
235 A.D. 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foreman-v-louis-jacques-construction-co-nyappdiv-1935.