Foreman v. Goldberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Foreman v. Goldberg

30 Misc. 785, 62 N.Y.S. 753

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 785 (Foreman v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foreman v. Goldberg, 30 Misc. 785, 62 N.Y.S. 753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence in this case fails to establish a contract of employment, and the judgment rendered for damages, for wrongful discharge, is absolutely without proof to support it. No period or rate of wages was specified, and the complaint should have been dismissed. Martin v. New York Life Ins. Co., 148 N. Y. 117.

Present: Beekman, P. J.; Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence in this case fails to establish a contract of employment, and the judgment rendered for damages, for wrongful discharge, is absolutely without proof to support it. No period or rate of wages was specified, and the complaint should have been dismissed. Martin v. New York Life Ins. Co., 148 N. Y. 117.

Present: Beekman, P. J.; Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Misc. 785, 62 N.Y.S. 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foreman-v-goldberg-nyappterm-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack