Foreman v. Fidelity Motors Co.

Baltimore City Superior Court

Foreman v. Fidelity Motors Co.

4 Balt. C. Rep. 402

DecidedJune 8, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Balt. C. Rep. 402 (Foreman v. Fidelity Motors Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Foreman v. Fidelity Motors Co., 4 Balt. C. Rep. 402 (Md. Super. Ct. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

STEIN, J.

It appearing from the declaration filed in the above entitled case, that the plaintiff having failed to require the defendant to plead within fifteen days, by laying the rule to so plead as required by the Speedy Judgment Act, it is the opinion of the Court that this ease is not within said act.

And it is ordered by the Court, this Sth day of June, 1925, that the defendant’s exceptions to the particulars filed by plaintiff are hereby overruled with leave to the defendant to plead within fifteen days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STEIN, J.

It appearing from the declaration filed in the above entitled case, that the plaintiff having failed to require the defendant to plead within fifteen days, by laying the rule to so plead as required by the Speedy Judgment Act, it is the opinion of the Court that this ease is not within said act.

And it is ordered by the Court, this Sth day of June, 1925, that the defendant’s exceptions to the particulars filed by plaintiff are hereby overruled with leave to the defendant to plead within fifteen days.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Balt. C. Rep. 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foreman-v-fidelity-motors-co-mdsuperctbalt-1925.