Foreman-Blades Lumber Co. v. Tunis Heading & Stave Co.

144 S.E. 368, 196 N.C. 38, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 269
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 12, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As we interpret the amended complaint the alleged cause of action is the wrongful conversion of timber, situated on land in Gates County, after the trees had been cut and sawed into lumber. In apt time the defendant made a motion to change the place of trial from Pasquotank to Gates. C. S., 470; Dixon v. Haar, 158 N. C., 341. The motion was denied, and the defendant excepted and appealed. The judgment denying the motion is free from error. Cedar Works v. Lumber Co., 161 N. C., 604. Judgment

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foreman-Blades Lumber Co. v. Tunis Heading & Stave Co., 144 S.E. 368, 196 N.C. 38, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 269 (N.C. 1928).

144 S.E. 368 (Foreman-Blades Lumber Co. v. Tunis Heading & Stave Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dixon v. . Haar
74 S.E. 1 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)
Cedar Works v. . Lumber Co.
77 S.E. 770 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)