Foreman-Blades Lumber Co. v. Tunis Heading & Stave Co.
This text of 144 S.E. 368 (Foreman-Blades Lumber Co. v. Tunis Heading & Stave Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As we interpret the amended complaint the alleged cause of action is the wrongful conversion of timber, situated on land in Gates County, after the trees had been cut and sawed into lumber. In apt time the defendant made a motion to change the place of trial from Pasquotank to Gates. C. S., 470; Dixon v. Haar, 158 N. C., 341. The motion was denied, and the defendant excepted and appealed. The judgment denying the motion is free from error. Cedar Works v. Lumber Co., 161 N. C., 604. Judgment
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 S.E. 368, 196 N.C. 38, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foreman-blades-lumber-co-v-tunis-heading-stave-co-nc-1928.