Fore v. Folsom
This text of 5 Miss. 282 (Fore v. Folsom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the court, by
It is contended on the part of the plaintiff below, that the affidavit is insufficient, in this, that it did not set forth any reason for not pleading in time, according to the rules of court.
To this it is answered that, if the defendant below makes affidavit that he has a meritorious defence to the action, showing what the merits are, that the court may judge of them, and makes his motion in time so as not to delay trial, the court will, and should set aside a judgment by default, and allow a plea to the merits; and of this opinion is this court. I consider [284]*284that it is the long established practice of the courts of the country to do this. The ends of justice are promoted by this course. The court will, in its discretion, see that no injustice is done to the opposite party, and will put the party in default upon terms, such as payment of costs, pleading instanter, and not delaying the trial of the cause. In this case the jury were in attendance, and the defence set up is a legal defence against the note sued on. See 6 John. Rep. 130, 131; Tidd, 592, 508; 2 Stra. 975; 4 Burr, 1996, 568.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for proceeding in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Miss. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fore-v-folsom-miss-1840.