Fordyce v. Spiegl

California Court of Appeal

Fordyce v. Spiegl

34 Cal. App. 802

California Court of Appeal·Decided June 20, 1917·No. Civ. No. 2056·Published

Opinion

RICHARDS, J.

The facts of this case are in all respects identical with the facts, in the case of Kerner v. Spiegl, ante, p. 162, [166 Pac. 1013], pending in this court, and this day decided, and the opinion in that case is equally applicable to the present one.

The order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is affirmed.

Beasly, J., pro tern., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 16, 1917.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICHARDS, J.

The facts of this case are in all respects identical with the facts, in the case of Kerner v. Spiegl, ante, p. 162, [166 Pac. 1013], pending in this court, and this day decided, and the opinion in that case is equally applicable to the present one.

The order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is affirmed.

Beasly, J., pro tern., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 16, 1917.

Fordyce v. Spiegl, 34 Cal. App. 802 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

34 Cal. App. 802 (Fordyce v. Spiegl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related