Fordham v. Greene

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 15, 1999
• Docket: 98-7750
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7750

KEITH FORDHAM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

FRED GREENE, Warden, Mecklenberg Correctional Center, Boydton, Virginia 23917,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-98-119-3)

Submitted: April 13, 1999 Decided: June 15, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Stanley David, MORRISSEY, HERSHNER & JACOBS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, Christopher G. Hill, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Vir- ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Keith Fordham appeals from the district court’s order finding

that the appropriate statute under which to review his action was

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998), rather than 28 U.S.C.A. §

2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We find that the district court did

not err by analyzing the action under § 1983. See Roller v.

Cavanaugh, 984 F.2d 120, 122 (4th Cir. 1993). Consequently, we af-

firm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED