Ford v. Village of Croton-on-Hudson
140 A.D.2d 666, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6174
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 31, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 140 A.D.2d 666 (Ford v. Village of Croton-on-Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ford v. Village of Croton-on-Hudson, 140 A.D.2d 666, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
On the record before us, the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action due to the failure of the plaintiff’s counsel to be ready for trial on the scheduled adjourned date (see, 22 NYCRR 125.1 [g]). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Malachi v. Good Samaritan Hospital
245 A.D.2d 492 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Foster v. Gherardi
201 A.D.2d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Clarke v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical Center
149 A.D.2d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.2d 666, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-village-of-croton-on-hudson-nyappdiv-1988.