Ford v. Village of Croton-on-Hudson
140 A.D.2d 666, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6174
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 31, 1988·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
On the record before us, the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action due to the failure of the plaintiff’s counsel to be ready for trial on the scheduled adjourned date (see, 22 NYCRR 125.1 [g]). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ford v. Village of Croton-on-Hudson, 140 A.D.2d 666, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
140 A.D.2d 666 (Ford v. Village of Croton-on-Hudson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Malachi v. Good Samaritan Hospital
245 A.D.2d 492 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Foster v. Gherardi
201 A.D.2d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Clarke v. New Rochelle Hospital Medical Center
149 A.D.2d 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)