Ford v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Ford v. United States

158 F.2d 797, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2468

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 14, 1946·No. No. 10219·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was heard upon the record, the briefs of respective parties and oral argument of counsel for appellants; and it appearing to the Court that the verdicts are supported by substantial evidence, that no exceptions were taken to the Court’s charge to the jury, and that appellants’ contention that there was a material variance between [798] the allegations of the indictment and the evidence on behalf of the appellee are not correct as a matter of law; it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case was heard upon the record, the briefs of respective parties and oral argument of counsel for appellants; and it appearing to the Court that the verdicts are supported by substantial evidence, that no exceptions were taken to the Court’s charge to the jury, and that appellants’ contention that there was a material variance between [798] the allegations of the indictment and the evidence on behalf of the appellee are not correct as a matter of law; it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Ford v. United States, 158 F.2d 797, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2468 (6th Cir. 1946).

Pincite

158 F.2d 797 (Ford v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.