Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.

521 S.E.2d 198, 238 Ga. App. 533, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2423, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 860
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 11, 1999
DocketA97A2505, A97A2506
StatusPublished

This text of 521 S.E.2d 198 (Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 521 S.E.2d 198, 238 Ga. App. 533, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2423, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 860 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

In Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 270 Ga. 730 (514 SE2d 201) (1999), the Supreme Court reversed the judgments of this court affirming the trial court’s grant of appellees’ motions to transfer the cases from Fulton County. Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co., 231 Ga. App. 11 (497 SE2d 596) (1998). Accordingly, our judgments in those cases are vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court, and the trial court’s orders are reversed.

Judgments reversed.

McMurray, R J., Pope, P. J., 1 Andrews, Ruffin, Eldridge, JJ., and Senior Appellate Judge Harold R. Banke 2 concur. Love & Willingham, Daryll Love, Allen S. Willingham, Robert P. Monyak, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.
497 S.E.2d 596 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.
514 S.E.2d 201 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 S.E.2d 198, 238 Ga. App. 533, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2423, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-uniroyal-goodrich-tire-co-gactapp-1999.