Ford v. Travis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Ford v. Travis

4 S.C.L. 299

DecidedApril 15, 1809

StatusPublished

This text of 4 S.C.L. 299 (Ford v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ford v. Travis, 4 S.C.L. 299 (S.C. 1809).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, J.,

said that, in the District Court, the counsel for the defendant had relied on the argument, that the court could not, on motion, set aside the judgment and execution, and that the argument, now used, had not been advanced there.

The court overruled the motion, on the ground that the District Court had decided correctly on the points made in that court; but recognized the doctrine contended for by Goodwin. But in this case the facts did not appear to the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.,

said that, in the District Court, the counsel for the defendant had relied on the argument, that the court could not, on motion, set aside the judgment and execution, and that the argument, now used, had not been advanced there.

The court overruled the motion, on the ground that the District Court had decided correctly on the points made in that court; but recognized the doctrine contended for by Goodwin. But in this case the facts did not appear to the District Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 S.C.L. 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-travis-sc-1809.