Ford v. State
This text of 615 S.W.2d 727 (Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
This is an appeal from a conviction for rape. Punishment, enhanced by allegation and proof of one prior felony conviction was assessed at 60 years.
*728 In his brief appellant points to fundamental error in the jury charge that requires reversal. Although the rape statute, V.T. C.A., Penal Code Sec. 21.02, does not expressly provide for a culpable mental state, one is nevertheless required because the statute does not plainly dispense with the need for one. V.T.C.A., Penal Code Sec. 6.02(b) and (c); Braxton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 528 S.W.2d 844; Zachery v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 552 S.W.2d 136. Although the indictment in this case properly alleged that appellant “knowingly and intentionally" committed acts constituting rape, the jury charge in its application of the law to the facts of the case omitted this element of the offense. This error is fundamental and requires reversal. See Banks v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 586 S.W.2d 518; North v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 598 S.W.2d 634 (aggravated rape).
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
615 S.W.2d 727, 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-state-texcrimapp-1981.