Ford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ford v. State

540 S.W.3d 889

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 6, 2018·No. No. ED 105646·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Ford appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

*890An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael Ford appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

*890An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Ford v. State, 540 S.W.3d 889 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

540 S.W.3d 889 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.