Ford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ford v. State

540 S.W.3d 889

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 6, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105646

StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.W.3d 889 (Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ford v. State, 540 S.W.3d 889 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Ford appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

*890An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael Ford appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

*890An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 S.W.3d 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-state-moctapp-2018.