Ford v. State

415 S.W.3d 138, 2013 WL 6236720, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1414
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 2013·No. No. ED 99173·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hubert Ford appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. State, 415 S.W.3d 138, 2013 WL 6236720, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1414 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

415 S.W.3d 138 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.