Ford v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Ford v. State

18 Ind. 484

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1862

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 18 Ind. 484 (Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ford v. State, 18 Ind. 484 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Prosecution against Peter Welch, Jane E. Swain, and Eliza Ford, for an assault and battery with intent to commit robbery. Motion- to quash the information overruled. Yerdict for the State. New trial refused, and judgment. Eliza Ford, one of the defendants, appeals to this Court. The judgment in this case, as to the appellant, is reversed on the ground that the information does not allege the facts necessary to confer jurisdiction on the Common Pleas. McCarty v. The State, 16 Ind. 310; Acts 1854, pp. 94, 95, sec. 2; Justic v. The State, at the last term.

The judgment is reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Prosecution against Peter Welch, Jane E. Swain, and Eliza Ford, for an assault and battery with intent to commit robbery. Motion- to quash the information overruled. Yerdict for the State. New trial refused, and judgment. Eliza Ford, one of the defendants, appeals to this Court. The judgment in this case, as to the appellant, is reversed on the ground that the information does not allege the facts necessary to confer jurisdiction on the Common Pleas. McCarty v. The State, 16 Ind. 310; Acts 1854, pp. 94, 95, sec. 2; Justic v. The State, at the last term.

The judgment is reversed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Ind. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-state-ind-1862.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack