Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Ford v. State

Ford v. State

158 S.E. 803, 43 Ga. App. 427, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 405
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 9, 1931
Docket21485
StatusPublished

This text of 158 S.E. 803 (Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ford v. State, 158 S.E. 803, 43 Ga. App. 427, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 405 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Bboyues, 0. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. Frank T. Grizmrd, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, John 8. McClelland, solicitor, J. W. LeCraw, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 S.E. 803, 43 Ga. App. 427, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-state-gactapp-1931.