Ford v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Ford v. State

106 S.E. 575, 151 Ga. 332, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 242

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 16, 1921·No. No. 2238·Published

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

No error is assigned upon any of the court’s rulings made pending the trial; but the motion contains only the usual general grounds, that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. Upon an examination of the brief of evidence contained in the record it appears that the verdict is not unauthorized by the evidence, and the judgment of the court below refusing a new trial is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except George, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

No error is assigned upon any of the court’s rulings made pending the trial; but the motion contains only the usual general grounds, that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. Upon an examination of the brief of evidence contained in the record it appears that the verdict is not unauthorized by the evidence, and the judgment of the court below refusing a new trial is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except George, J., absent.

Ford v. State, 106 S.E. 575, 151 Ga. 332, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 242 (Ga. 1921).

Pincite

106 S.E. 575 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.