Ford v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Ford v. State

106 S.E. 575, 151 Ga. 332, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 242

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 16, 1921

DocketNo. 2238

StatusPublished

This text of 106 S.E. 575 (Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ford v. State, 106 S.E. 575, 151 Ga. 332, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 242 (Ga. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

No error is assigned upon any of the court’s rulings made pending the trial; but the motion contains only the usual general grounds, that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. Upon an examination of the brief of evidence contained in the record it appears that the verdict is not unauthorized by the evidence, and the judgment of the court below refusing a new trial is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except George, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

No error is assigned upon any of the court’s rulings made pending the trial; but the motion contains only the usual general grounds, that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. Upon an examination of the brief of evidence contained in the record it appears that the verdict is not unauthorized by the evidence, and the judgment of the court below refusing a new trial is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except George, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 S.E. 575, 151 Ga. 332, 1921 Ga. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-state-ga-1921.