Ford v. State

850 So. 2d 605, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10221, 2003 WL 21537408
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 801 So. 2d 318
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 9, 2003·No. No. 4D02-2590·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm an order denying Appellant’s motion to withdraw plea. The record reflects that the motion is facially insufficient. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(1); 9.140(b)(2)(A); Harris v. State, 818 So.2d 567 (Fla. 2d DCA2002).

GUNTHER, STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. State, 850 So. 2d 605, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10221, 2003 WL 21537408 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

850 So. 2d 605 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
818 So. 2d 567 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)