Ford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ford v. State

418 So. 2d 408, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28692

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 18, 1982

DocketNo. 81-2556

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 418 So. 2d 408 (Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ford v. State, 418 So. 2d 408, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28692 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment and sentence is affirmed. However, that portion of the court’s order requiring appellant to pay court costs and to make payments to the Victim’s Crime Compensation Fund is stricken because the appellant was found insolvent by the trial court. Engle v. State, 407 So.2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

GRIMES, A. C. J., and RYDER and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment and sentence is affirmed. However, that portion of the court’s order requiring appellant to pay court costs and to make payments to the Victim’s Crime Compensation Fund is stricken because the appellant was found insolvent by the trial court. Engle v. State, 407 So.2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

GRIMES, A. C. J., and RYDER and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

418 So. 2d 408, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack