Ford v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ford v. State

66 So. 2d 208, 37 Ala. App. 244, 1953 Ala. App. LEXIS 466, 1953 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 183

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 16, 1953

Docket7 Div. 262

StatusPublished

This text of 66 So. 2d 208 (Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ford v. State, 66 So. 2d 208, 37 Ala. App. 244, 1953 Ala. App. LEXIS 466, 1953 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 183 (Ala. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

CARR, Presiding Judge.

In the lower court the accused was convicted on a charge of buying, receiving, concealing or aiding in concealing a cow.

The defendant did not request the general affirmative charge; neither did he file a motion for a new trial. In this state of the record we are not privileged to determine whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the judgment of conviction. Kincey v. State, 36 Ala.App. 301, 55 So.2d 368.

During the progress of the trial the court ruled against the position of the appellant in a few instances. As the law demands, we have given due consideration to these matters. The rulings relate to principles which are elementary in nature. A discussion by us could not serve any useful purpose.

The judgment below is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI