Ford v. State

514 So. 2d 1060, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4599
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided September 25, 1987·No. 86-902·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MADDOX, Justice.

Writ denied. By denying the writ, we point out that writs of certiorari are frequently denied without any consideration of the merits. Haden v. Olan Mills, Inc., 273 Ala. 129, 135 So.2d 388 (1961). A denial of certiorari should never be considered as an expression by the reviewing court on the merits of the controversy. See Hamilton Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers, 240 U.S. 251, 36 S.Ct. 269, 60 L.Ed. 629 (1916). Our denial of the writ should not be understood as approving or disapproving the language used, or the statements of law contained, in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Cooper v. State, 287 Ala. 728, 252 So.2d 108 (1971).

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, BEATTY, ADAMS, HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., concur. ALMON and SHORES, JJ., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. State, 514 So. 2d 1060, 1987 Ala. LEXIS 4599 (Ala. 1987).

514 So. 2d 1060 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Demetrius Avery Jackson, Jr. v. State of Alabama.
169 So. 3d 1 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2010)
Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.
835 So. 2d 137 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2002)
Reese v. State
549 So. 2d 148 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1989)