Ford v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

614 F.3d 1241, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17198, 2010 WL 3245406
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 18, 2010
DocketNo. 09-14820
StatusPublished

This text of 614 F.3d 1241 (Ford v. Secretary, Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ford v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 614 F.3d 1241, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17198, 2010 WL 3245406 (11th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. See Ford v. McNeil, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 3453, — L.Ed.2d -(2010). This Court denied in an unpublished order James D. Ford’s application for a certificate of appealability about the issue whether Ford is entitled to equitable tolling of the one-year limitations period in the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). The Supreme Court vacated that order and remanded to this Court for further consideration in the light of Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 2549, 177 L.Ed.2d 130 (2010). We now remand to the district court for the limited purpose of conducting further proceedings and fact-finding — including, if necessary, an evidentiary hearing' — consistent with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court in Holland.

LIMITED REMAND.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holland v. Florida
177 L. Ed. 2d 130 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Ford v. McNeil
177 L. Ed. 2d 1052 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
614 F.3d 1241, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17198, 2010 WL 3245406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-secretary-department-of-corrections-ca11-2010.