Ford v. Rogers

117 So. 872, 96 Fla. 167, 1928 Fla. LEXIS 806
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 10, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam

Appellee brought suit in the Eighteenth Judicial Court of Florida against appellants for the pur *168 pose of dissolving a partnership between them, (appellants and appellee), for an accounting of.the affairs of said partnership and to recover such amounts as might be found due the appellee by appellants. There was a final decree in favor of appellee and appeal was taken from that final decree. We have examined the record carefully and while we observe evidences of poor pleading and irregular procedure we believe that such errors under the facts presented were harmless and that the final decree accords with the justice of the cause. It is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J. and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. Rogers, 117 So. 872, 96 Fla. 167, 1928 Fla. LEXIS 806 (Fla. 1928).

117 So. 872 (Ford v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.