Ford v. Rodriguez

686 S.E.2d 514, 2009 WL 3818343, 363 N.C. 652
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 5, 2009
Docket358P09
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 686 S.E.2d 514 (Ford v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ford v. Rodriguez, 686 S.E.2d 514, 2009 WL 3818343, 363 N.C. 652 (N.C. 2009).

Opinion

686 S.E.2d 514 (2009)

Jean Peek FORD, Plaintiff,
v.
Beth Cummings RODRIGUEZ, Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff,
v.
Graham Michael Ford, Third-Party Defendant.

No. 358P09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 5, 2009.

E. Gregory Stott, Raleigh, for Jean Peek Ford.

G. Clark Hering, IV, Greensboro, for Beth Cummings Rodriguez.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 28th of August 2009 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th of November 2009."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fussell v. NC FARM BUREAU
686 S.E.2d 514 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 S.E.2d 514, 2009 WL 3818343, 363 N.C. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-rodriguez-nc-2009.