Ford v. Price & Lucas Cider & Vinegar Co.
This text of 43 S.E. 69 (Ford v. Price & Lucas Cider & Vinegar Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The only part of the verdict excepted to as illegal having been voluntarily written off by the plaintiff in the court below, and the jury in the justice’s court having been, by consent, allowed to examine the keg and its contents, the character of which was in dispute, and having based its verdict upon this examination and other evidence, the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
2. The decisions of this court holding that it is error for the judge of the superior court, on the hearing of a petition for certiorari, to render a final judgment in a case where there is a conflict in the evidence as to material facts in issue, can, in the nature of things, only apply to a. case where the petition for certiorari is sustained, and not to one where the petition is overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 S.E. 69, 116 Ga. 793, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-price-lucas-cider-vinegar-co-ga-1902.