Ford v. Northern Insurance Company of New York

1962 OK 71, 371 P.2d 95, 1962 Okla. LEXIS 339
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 20, 1962·No. No. 39472·Published

Opinion

BERRY, Justice.

This is a companion case to Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Paul H. Ford et al., No. 39,471, which was this day decided. The case is reported in 371 P.2d 92.

The parties to this appeal will be referred to as in our opinion in No. 39,471.

The plaintiffs’ position in the instant case is that they were entitled to judgment against either Northern or Queen; that while they are of the opinion that the trial court did not err in rendering judgment against Northern and not Queen, possibility existed that this Court might hold otherwise in No. 39,471 and for said reason they preserved their claim and action against Queen by perfecting this appeal.

The facts and issues presented by this case are the same as those presented in No. 39,471. Our opinion in said case is therefore adopted as our opinion herein.

Affirmed.

WILLIAMS, C. J., BLACKBIRD, V. C. J., and HALLEY, JOHNSON, JACK SON and IRWIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. Northern Insurance Company of New York, 1962 OK 71, 371 P.2d 95, 1962 Okla. LEXIS 339 (Okla. 1962).

1962 OK 71 (Ford v. Northern Insurance Company of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Ford
1962 OK 70 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1962)