Ford v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole
72 So. 3d 727, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 1276, 2009 WL 8466477
This text of 72 So. 3d 727 (Ford v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ford v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, 72 So. 3d 727, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 1276, 2009 WL 8466477 (Ala. 2009).
Opinion
ROBERT H. FORD
v.
NESS, MOTLEY, LOADHOLT, RICHARDSON & POOLE, ET AL.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
72 So. 3d 727, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 1276, 2009 WL 8466477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-ness-motley-loadholt-richardson-poole-ala-2009.