Ford v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.

101 A. 958, 258 Pa. 124, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 806
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 7, 1917
DocketAppeal, No. 316
StatusPublished

This text of 101 A. 958 (Ford v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ford v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co., 101 A. 958, 258 Pa. 124, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 806 (Pa. 1917).

Opinion

Pee Ctjeiatvi,

It appears from the testimony in this case that in other mines, and in other parts of appellant’s mine, the signal to hoist or lower cars was located in a safety hole. If the deceased had been in such a hole when he was attempting to ring the bell to signal the engineer, he could not have been struck by the car which ran down the slope and jumped the track. Whether the defendant’s failure to provide a safety hole where the deceased was working, was negligence, was properly regarded by the learned trial judge as a question of fact for the jury. It was the only question in the case, and judgment on the verdict is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A. 958, 258 Pa. 124, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-lehigh-wilkes-barre-coal-co-pa-1917.