Ford v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
This text of 175 So. 3d 375 (Ford v. JPMorgan Chase Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Josephine Ford, appeals from the final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Appellee, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. Appellant argues, inter alia, that Appellee clearly lacked standing to bring the foreclosure action and that the sole witness presented by Appellee was not competent to testify as he did not work for any company or organization involved in any way with the loan in question. Additionally, Appellant contends the trial judge did not permit Appellant sufficient time and opportunity to present her case and denied her the opportunity to argue a motion for involuntary dismissal. We commend Appellee for confessing error as to its failure to prove standing. We reverse the final judgment of foreclosure and remand to the trial court with instructions to vacate the final judgment, enter an order determining and awarding fees to Appellant in accordance with the court’s separately entered order, and thereafter, dismiss the underlying foreclosure action.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 So. 3d 375, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13896, 2015 WL 5456742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-jpmorgan-chase-bank-fladistctapp-2015.