Ford v. Irving Air Chute Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ford v. Irving Air Chute Co.

251 A.D. 787, 298 N.Y.S. 162, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7520

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 787 (Ford v. Irving Air Chute Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ford v. Irving Air Chute Co., 251 A.D. 787, 298 N.Y.S. 162, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs on this appeal to either party. Memorandum: While we doubt whether any defenses affirmative in their nature are set up in the answer, still we need not pass upon this at this time, for we are of. the opinion that under paragraphs 1 and 2 of the notice for examination the plaintiff will be granted all the relief which is necessary and to which he is entitled under the pleading. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to modify plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial of defendant’s president in an action to recover unpaid salary.) Present —■ Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs on this appeal to either party. Memorandum: While we doubt whether any defenses affirmative in their nature are set up in the answer, still we need not pass upon this at this time, for we are of. the opinion that under paragraphs 1 and 2 of the notice for examination the plaintiff will be granted all the relief which is necessary and to which he is entitled under the pleading. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion to modify plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial of defendant’s president in an action to recover unpaid salary.) Present —■ Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 787, 298 N.Y.S. 162, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-irving-air-chute-co-nyappdiv-1937.