Ford v. Hayes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ford v. Hayes

404 S.W.3d 461, 2013 WL 3944282, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 889

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 30, 2013·No. No. WD 75474·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Lavorsia Ford sued Niecie’s Restaurant, Denise Hayes, and Denmar of Kansas City, Inc. (collectively “the Restaurant”) for food poisoning she claims she contracted from food served at Niecie’s Restaurant in Kansas City. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Restaurant, finding that Ford had failed to present competent evidence that any illness she suffered was caused by food from the Restaurant. Ford appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Lavorsia Ford sued Niecie’s Restaurant, Denise Hayes, and Denmar of Kansas City, Inc. (collectively “the Restaurant”) for food poisoning she claims she contracted from food served at Niecie’s Restaurant in Kansas City. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Restaurant, finding that Ford had failed to present competent evidence that any illness she suffered was caused by food from the Restaurant. Ford appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Ford v. Hayes, 404 S.W.3d 461, 2013 WL 3944282, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 889 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

404 S.W.3d 461 (Ford v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.