Ford v. Gardner

1 Johns. Cas. 243
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defect is thereby cured. The identity of the plaintiff below being ascertained, it was the duty of the defendant there to have availed himself of the variance before the -justice, instead of which he did not appear, and suffered judgment by default,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. Gardner, 1 Johns. Cas. 243 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

1 Johns. Cas. 243 (Ford v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoffman v. Fish
18 Abb. Pr. 76 (New York County Courts, 1864)