Ford v. Ford

44 A. 561, 193 Pa. 530, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1159
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 6, 1899·No. Appeal, No. 127·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Our consideration of tbe pleadings and proofs in this case has satisfied us that there is no error in the learned trial judge’s findings of fact or conclusions of law that requires a reversal or modification of the decree. His findings of 'fact are fully warranted by the evidence, and the conclusions drawn from the facts thus established appear to be correct. There is nothing in either of the nineteen specifications of error that requires discussion.

On the facts found by the learned trial judge, and for reasons given in his opinion, we affirm the decree and dismiss the appeal at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. Ford, 44 A. 561, 193 Pa. 530, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1159 (Pa. 1899).

44 A. 561 (Ford v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.
194 A. 106 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1937)