Ford v. Ford

44 A. 561, 193 Pa. 530, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1159
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 6, 1899
DocketAppeal, No. 127
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 A. 561 (Ford v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ford v. Ford, 44 A. 561, 193 Pa. 530, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1159 (Pa. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Our consideration of tbe pleadings and proofs in this case has satisfied us that there is no error in the learned trial judge’s findings of fact or conclusions of law that requires a reversal or modification of the decree. His findings of 'fact are fully warranted by the evidence, and the conclusions drawn from the facts thus established appear to be correct. There is nothing in either of the nineteen specifications of error that requires discussion.

On the facts found by the learned trial judge, and for reasons given in his opinion, we affirm the decree and dismiss the appeal at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.
194 A. 106 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 A. 561, 193 Pa. 530, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-ford-pa-1899.