Ford v. Ford

Appellate Court of Illinois

Ford v. Ford

192 Ill. App. 12

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 11, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,251

StatusPublished

This text of 192 Ill. App. 12 (Ford v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ford v. Ford, 192 Ill. App. 12 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Appeal and error, § 1269*—when findings presumed sustained T)y evidence. Where on appeal from a decree in a supplementary proceeding awarding expense money and counsel fees pending an appeal from a decree in separate maintenance proceedings, which former decree was rendered upon the pleadings and transcript of the testimony upon the trial of the original cause and upon the final decree entered therein, neither the record nor the final decree in the original cause were included in the .transcript of the record, it will be presumed that the facts appearing therein warranted the decree complained of.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Appeal and error, § 1269*—when findings presumed sustained T)y evidence. Where on appeal from a decree in a supplementary proceeding awarding expense money and counsel fees pending an appeal from a decree in separate maintenance proceedings, which former decree was rendered upon the pleadings and transcript of the testimony upon the trial of the original cause and upon the final decree entered therein, neither the record nor the final decree in the original cause were included in the .transcript of the record, it will be presumed that the facts appearing therein warranted the decree complained of.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 Ill. App. 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-ford-illappct-1915.