Ford v. Doulos-Ayers
This text of 1991 Mass. App. Div. 85 (Ford v. Doulos-Ayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 64(c) (5), defendant filed three petitions to establish reports. The reports were timely filed and hearings were requested, but as the three month time period for the establishment of the reports approached, the trial judge had not held a hearing and had not established the reports. In order to preserve its rights to appellate review, defendant filed these petitions. We remand these cases to allow additional time for the establishment of the reports.
Rule 64(c)(5) authorizes the appellate division to extend the time to establish reports. Because of the importance of the hearing before the trial judge, we remand in order to allow the trial judge an additional 45 day s from the date of this decision to establish the reports. Federico v. Ragusa, 1990 Mass. App. Div. 93, 94.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1991 Mass. App. Div. 85, 1991 Mass. App. Div. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-doulos-ayers-massdistctapp-1991.