Ford v. Doulos-Ayers

1991 Mass. App. Div. 85, 1991 Mass. App. Div. LEXIS 43
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division·Decided June 21, 1991·Published

Opinion

Lombardo, J.

Pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 64(c) (5), defendant filed three petitions to establish reports. The reports were timely filed and hearings were requested, but as the three month time period for the establishment of the reports approached, the trial judge had not held a hearing and had not established the reports. In order to preserve its rights to appellate review, defendant filed these petitions. We remand these cases to allow additional time for the establishment of the reports.

Rule 64(c)(5) authorizes the appellate division to extend the time to establish reports. Because of the importance of the hearing before the trial judge, we remand in order to allow the trial judge an additional 45 day s from the date of this decision to establish the reports. Federico v. Ragusa, 1990 Mass. App. Div. 93, 94.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. Doulos-Ayers, 1991 Mass. App. Div. 85, 1991 Mass. App. Div. LEXIS 43 (Mass. Ct. App. 1991).

1991 Mass. App. Div. 85 (Ford v. Doulos-Ayers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federico v. Ragusa
1990 Mass. App. Div. 93 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1990)