Ford v. Conklin

781 So. 2d 1070, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 334, 2001 WL 169614
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 22, 2001
DocketNo. SC96152
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 781 So. 2d 1070 (Ford v. Conklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ford v. Conklin, 781 So. 2d 1070, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 334, 2001 WL 169614 (Fla. 2001).

Opinion

QUINCE, J.

We have for review a decision on the following question of great public importance certified by the First District Court of Appeal in Conklin v. Ford, 737 So.2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999):

WHERE AN EMPLOYER TAKES A WORKERS’ COMPENSATION OFFSET UNDER SECTION 440.20(15), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), AND INITIALLY INCLUDES SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PAID UNDER SECTION 440.15(l)(e)l, FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), IS THE EMPLOYER ENTITLED TO RECALCULATE THE OFFSET BASED ON THE YEARLY 5% INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS?

We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in City of Clearwater v. Acker, 755 So.2d 597 (Fla.1999), we answer the certified question in the negative and approve the First District’s decision in this case.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herzfeld v. Herzfeld
781 So. 2d 1070 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
781 So. 2d 1070, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 334, 2001 WL 169614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-conklin-fla-2001.