Ford v. Conklin
781 So. 2d 1070, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 334, 2001 WL 169614
Opinion
We have for review a decision on the following question of great public importance certified by the First District Court of Appeal in Conklin v. Ford, 737 So.2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999):
WHERE AN EMPLOYER TAKES A WORKERS’ COMPENSATION OFFSET UNDER SECTION 440.20(15), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), AND INITIALLY INCLUDES SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PAID UNDER SECTION 440.15(l)(e)l, FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), IS THE EMPLOYER ENTITLED TO RECALCULATE THE OFFSET BASED ON THE YEARLY 5% INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS?
We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in City of Clearwater v. Acker, 755 So.2d 597 (Fla.1999), we answer the certified question in the negative and approve the First District’s decision in this case.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ford v. Conklin, 781 So. 2d 1070, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 98, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 334, 2001 WL 169614 (Fla. 2001).
781 So. 2d 1070 (Ford v. Conklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herzfeld v. Herzfeld
781 So. 2d 1070 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)